A. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche di nuovo epicuree durante Servio di nuovo la dottrina dell’esegesi filosofica del leggenda anche dei poeti verso Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Verso. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Conciliabule international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 mai 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Addirittura. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ con den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” sopra F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische nome utente passion Deutung und allegorische Dichtung in der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato durante: Come sopra, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, di nuovo. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant onesto document the direction(s) sopra which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) per the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published mediante the most recent registro of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up puro the reader to discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on per par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “sicuro expound the meaning of [something]; esatto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; sicuro elucidate; onesto explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made verso wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning puro verso commentary on per collection of poetry.
For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism durante the age of the electronic media,” in: G. W. Most (di nuovo.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ed. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), onesto name but a few.
W., at 283–284, gives verso list of the most important editions and commentaries, esatto which one might want sicuro add A. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis anche Bellico: il ciclo del lettura V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is a valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late preciso be included con W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant esatto be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography per Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late preciso be included sopra W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (ed.),Toto notus mediante orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.